This contemporary application episode examines reporting on foreign influence in the decisions that led to war with Iran. Drawing on the New York Times investigation by Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman, the resignation testimony of former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent, and the President’s own public statements, the episode applies the founders’ framework — particularly Washington’s Farewell Address warnings about “passionate attachment” to foreign nation

This episode examines how foreign governments—particularly Britain, Israel, and Saudi Arabia—influence American foreign policy through lobbying, campaign contributions, think tanks, intelligence sharing, and the revolving door between government and advocacy. The episode applies a consistent analytical standard—cui bono—to all relationships, examining the costs and benefits of each and asking whether American interests are served.

This contemporary application episode connects the “indispensable nation” ideology examined in Episode 13 to its economic foundation—the petrodollar system established in 1974. The self-reinforcing loop between dollar hegemony and American military dominance of the Persian Gulf is now being tested by the Iran war. Five weeks into the conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains under Iranian control operating as a yuan-denominated toll booth, American aircraft have been shot down d

The question is not whether foreign influence exists. It does, and it is as old as the republic. The question is whether these relationships serve American interests. That is the question George Washington asked in 1796. It remains the right question today.

This contemporary application episode traces the direct line from the 1917 Balfour Declaration to present-day Gaza and the West Bank. We examine Balfour’s explicit calculation—his refusal to consult “the wishes of the present inhabitants”—and trace how that imperial logic persists in the current “ceasefire,” the Board of Peace reconstruction framework, and the accelerating annexation of the West Bank. We present data on ceasefire violations and casualties, analyze the Kushner

Understanding Sykes-Picot is essential to understanding why the Middle East looks the way it does—and why American intervention there repeatedly fails.