top of page


The Conservative Counterrevolution: Reagan and the Limits of Rolling Back the State
The Conservative Counterrevolution. Intellectual dominance. Rhetorical victory. Electoral success. But the administrative state survived intact. Spending grew. Agencies remained. Entitlements were untouched. Debt exploded.
Why? Because institutions are more durable than ideas. Because constituencies defend their interests. Because path dependency creates irreversibility.
The administrative welfare state, once built, proved nearly impossible to dismantle
Nov 29, 20251 min read


The Conservative Counterrevolution — Reagan and the Limits of Rolling Back the State
Richard Nixon took office in 1969 promising to “return power to the states.” His New Federalism proposed shifting responsibility for welfare and education downward while consolidating federal aid into block grants.
But the machinery of cooperative federalism—grants, audits, matching formulas—remained intact. Nixon replaced categorical grants with larger ones but left the fiscal pipeline untouched. Federal aid to states increased from $24 billion in 1970 to $47 billion by 197
Oct 11, 20254 min read
bottom of page